At the center of the lawsuit is glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, one of the most widely used herbicides by conventional farmers. It is also used in munitions.
The Supreme Court weighs whether Monsanto’s Roundup weedkiller needs a cancer warning as its owner challenges a $1.25 million ...
The Supreme Court is considering arguments around the broadly used herbicide glyphosate, which is sold by Bayer subsidiary ...
The maker of a popular weedkiller, called Roundup, argues it can't be sued for not warning it could cause cancer. The Trump ...
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Monsanto Company v. Durnell, a case that will determine the balance of ...
The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments on Monday over whether federal law shields the maker of the weedkiller Roundup from ...
As activists rallied outside the Supreme Court during the glyphosate hearing, their concerns offered a different perspective ...
The hearing could have serious implications for the MAHA campaign, which stands firmly against the use of pesticides.
The Supreme Court appeared divided over whether the maker of weed killer Roundup can be sued for failing to warn about ...
Some people in the MAHA movement are angry with the Trump administration's stance on environmental toxins — including its ...
MAHA influencers, Democratic senators, and cancer patients agree on one thing: You should be able to sue Bayer.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results